Inconsistency in TAS field labeling for Correspondence Code
This is just a minor annoyance related to inconsistency in labeling. We are using Mail Preferences as the opt-in page for correspondence codes.
Jun 29 2015
Organization Name (Please enter full organization name)
Enter a subject
Log in / Sign up
Identify yourself with your email address
You won't be notified about changes to this idea.
Managed Correspondence:Merge Label file showing merge fields placeholders instead of blank text
Default Address input field labels should be used in search results
BBECRM: Require a wider range of fields which can be made mandatory.
Allow Administrators to Change Field Labels
add an automatic trim of leading and trailing spaces to the address postcode (zip code, postal code) field
Add/edit payment screens - inconsistency with reference field
Label the Transaction Type field consistently in the tool
Job Title is a free text field rather than code table